Randy Diehl v. Attorney General for the State, et al
| RANDY SCOTT DIEHL |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director |
| 21-16273 |
| August 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Randy Scott Diehl letter dated 09/03/2021 re: Clarification of issues seeking review. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12220526] (QDL) [Entered: 09/03/2021 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Entered in error. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Original Text: Entered appearance of Prison Librarian AZ Eyman Librarian. [12220441] (RL) [Entered: 09/03/2021 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Entered in error. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Original Text: Entered appearance of Prison Librarian AZ Eyman Librarian. [12220439] (RL) [Entered: 09/03/2021 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Entered in error. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Original Text: Entered appearance of Prison Librarian AZ Eyman Librarian. [12220436] (RL) [Entered: 09/03/2021 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Randy Scott Diehl motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/02/2021. [12192159] (WL) [Entered: 08/04/2021 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 07/22/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12192135] (WL) [Entered: 08/04/2021 02:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
