Lonzell Threats v. J. Shartle
Petitioner / Appellant: LONZELL J. THREATS
Respondent / Appellee: J. T. SHARTLE, Warden, named as Warden Shartle
Case Number: 21-16302
Filed: August 10, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 9, 2023 LONZELL THREATS V. J. SHARTLE

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2021 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Lonzell J. Threats motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/15/2021. [12234665] (DJV) [Entered: 09/21/2021 12:40 PM]
September 20, 2021 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Lonzell J. Threats motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/15/2021. [12234090] (DJV) [Entered: 09/21/2021 07:37 AM]
September 20, 2021 Filing 5 Streamlined request by Appellant Lonzell J. Threats to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamline requests allow for 30 day extensions. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Lonzell J. Threats opening brief due 11/29/2021. Appellee J. T. Shartle, Warden answering brief due 12/29/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12233863] (DLM) [Entered: 09/20/2021 04:32 PM]
September 7, 2021 Filing 4 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The opening brief is due October 29, 2021. The answering brief is due November 29, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellee must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. Id. (MOATT) [12221276] (AF) [Entered: 09/07/2021 10:28 AM]
August 30, 2021 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Lonzell J. Threats motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/23/2021. [12215411] (DJV) [Entered: 08/30/2021 02:26 PM]
August 18, 2021 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12205162] (CKP) [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:58 PM]
August 10, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lonzell J. Threats opening brief due 10/04/2021. Appellee J. T. Shartle, Warden answering brief due 11/03/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12196828] (JMR) [Entered: 08/10/2021 10:30 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lonzell Threats v. J. Shartle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: LONZELL J. THREATS
Represented By: Lonzell J. Threats
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: J. T. SHARTLE, Warden, named as Warden Shartle
Represented By: Dennis C. Bastron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?