Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. David Shinn, et al
| ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON |
| DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA |
| 21-16331 |
| August 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MANDATE ISSUED. (MDH, PJW and KKL) [12252109] (RR) [Entered: 10/08/2021 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): This court entered an order dismissing this appeal for lack of jurisdiction on September 16, 2021. Accordingly, the court will take no action on appellants motion dated September 16, 2021 and filed on September 21, 2021 (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]). This appeal remains closed. [12241294] (WL) [Entered: 09/28/2021 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson emergency motion pursuant to FRCP Rule 60. Deficiencies: None. [12237195] (RR) [Entered: 09/23/2021 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, PAUL J. WATFORD and KENNETH K. LEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court has not issued an orders that are final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12231001] (WL) [Entered: 09/16/2021 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of District Court order filed on 09/01/2021. IT IS ORDERED denying without prejudice and as premature Petitioners motion for certificate of appealability (Doc. 12). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing Petitioner not to file any stipulated filings unless opposing counsel has signed the stipulated filing. [12218942] (RR) [Entered: 09/02/2021 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12202418] (RT) [Entered: 08/16/2021 12:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
