Danny Fabricant v. A. Miranda, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANNY FABRICANT
Defendant / Appellee: A. MIRANDA, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit C-2 Case Manager, SHIRLEY BROWN, individually and in her official capacity as Unit C-2 Correctional Counselor, K. ADAMIEC, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit C Manager, J. T. SHARTLE, Warden, individually and in his/her official capacity as Warden, DOE I, individually and in his/her official capacity as a federal employee in an unknown position at USP Tucson, DOE II, individually and in his/her official capacity as an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) at the United States Attorney's Office in Tucson, AZ, DOE III, individually and in his/her official capacity as an AUSA at the USAO in Tucson, AZ, DOE IV, individually and in his/her official capacity as the Unit Representative during the third shift on April 24, 2017 at USP Victorville, DOE V, individually and in his/her official capacity as the Special Investigative Service (SIS) Representative during the third shift on April 24, 2017 at USP Victorville, DAVID SHINN, Director, individually and in his official capacity as Warden, MARY MITCHELL, individually and in her official capacity as Regional Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), HUGH J. HURWITZ, in his official capacity as acting Director of the BOP, THOMAS R. KANE, individually and in his official capacity as the now former acting Director of the BOP, between unknown dates in early 2016 through late 2017 and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, individually and in his official capacity as the now former Director of the BOP, from an unknown date through early 2016
Case Number: 21-16345
Filed: August 17, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 26, 2022 DANNY FABRICANT V. A. MIRANDA

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2021 Filing 13 Filed Appellant Danny Fabricant motion objection to any request for extensions of time. Deficiencies: None. [12251288] (JFF) [Entered: 10/07/2021 03:33 PM]
October 1, 2021 Filing 12 Filed Appellant Danny Fabricant letter dated 09/23/2021 re: Case status request. Paper filing deficiency: None. (sent copy of docket sheet) [12245731] (RL) [Entered: 10/01/2021 08:27 PM]
September 21, 2021 Filing 11 Attorneys Erica McCallum,substituted by Attorneys Robert Lally Miskell, [12234528] (JFF) [Entered: 09/21/2021 11:21 AM]
September 21, 2021 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Robert L. Miskell (U.S. Attorney's Office, 405 W. Congress, Suite 4800, Tucson, AZ 85701) for Appellees K. Adamiec, Shirley Brown, Doe I, Doe II, Doe III, Doe IV, Doe V, Hugh J. Hurwitz, Thomas R. Kane, A. Miranda, Mary Mitchell, Charles E. Samuels, J. T. Shartle and David Shinn. Substitution for Attorney Erica McCallum for Appellees K. Adamiec, Shirley Brown, A. Miranda and J. T. Shartle. Date of service: 09/21/2021. (Party was previously proceeding pro se.) [12234128] [21-16345] (Miskell, Robert) [Entered: 09/21/2021 08:24 AM]
September 20, 2021 Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): The appellants opposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) to shorten the due date for the answering brief is construed as a motion to expedite the briefing schedule and, so construed, is denied. The opening brief has been filed. The answering brief remains due November 12, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12233898] (AF) [Entered: 09/20/2021 04:42 PM]
September 10, 2021 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellees K. Adamiec, Shirley Brown, A. Miranda and J. T. Shartle response opposing motion ([ # 4 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 09/10/2021. [12225163] [21-16345] (McCallum, Erica) [Entered: 09/10/2021 10:14 AM]
September 2, 2021 Filing 7 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Danny Fabricant opening brief of 50 pages (Informal: No). Served on 09/02/2021. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Filed with minor deficiencies: no certificate of service on appellee's counsel. [12219164] (KWG) [Entered: 09/02/2021 02:46 PM]
September 1, 2021 Filing 5 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12217778] (CKP) [Entered: 09/01/2021 11:55 AM]
August 31, 2021 Filing 6 Filed 1 copy of Appellant Danny Fabricant's excerpts of record in 1 volume. [12218352] (LA) [Entered: 09/01/2021 05:12 PM]
August 31, 2021 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Danny Fabricant motion to shorten time for the filing of appelless's responding brief. Deficiencies: None. [12217550] (JFF) [Entered: 09/01/2021 10:09 AM]
August 31, 2021 Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated. [Case Number 21-16345: Partially Paid] [12216899] (JFF) [Entered: 08/31/2021 03:08 PM]
August 19, 2021 Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12206007] (CKP) [Entered: 08/19/2021 12:33 PM]
August 17, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Danny Fabricant opening brief due 10/12/2021. Appellees K. Adamiec, Shirley Brown, A. Miranda and J. T. Shartle, Warden answering brief due 11/12/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12204145] (JPD) [Entered: 08/17/2021 04:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Danny Fabricant v. A. Miranda, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DANNY FABRICANT
Represented By: Danny Fabricant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: A. MIRANDA, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit C-2 Case Manager
Represented By: Erica McCallum
Represented By: Robert Lally Miskell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHIRLEY BROWN, individually and in her official capacity as Unit C-2 Correctional Counselor
Represented By: Erica McCallum
Represented By: Robert Lally Miskell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: K. ADAMIEC, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit C Manager
Represented By: Erica McCallum
Represented By: Robert Lally Miskell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: J. T. SHARTLE, Warden, individually and in his/her official capacity as Warden
Represented By: Erica McCallum
Represented By: Robert Lally Miskell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOE I, individually and in his/her official capacity as a federal employee in an unknown position at USP Tucson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOE II, individually and in his/her official capacity as an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) at the United States Attorney's Office in Tucson, AZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOE III, individually and in his/her official capacity as an AUSA at the USAO in Tucson, AZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOE IV, individually and in his/her official capacity as the Unit Representative during the third shift on April 24, 2017 at USP Victorville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOE V, individually and in his/her official capacity as the Special Investigative Service (SIS) Representative during the third shift on April 24, 2017 at USP Victorville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, individually and in his official capacity as Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARY MITCHELL, individually and in her official capacity as Regional Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HUGH J. HURWITZ, in his official capacity as acting Director of the BOP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THOMAS R. KANE, individually and in his official capacity as the now former acting Director of the BOP, between unknown dates in early 2016 through late 2017
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHARLES E. SAMUELS, individually and in his official capacity as the now former Director of the BOP, from an unknown date through early 2016
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?