Rune Kraft v. State of Arizona, et al
| RUNE KRAFT |
| STATE OF ARIZONA, JAMES P. BEENE, ROBERT M. BRUTINEL, KENT E. CATTANI, DAVID W. GARBARINO, DAVID B. GASS, DOUGLAS GERLACH, JOHN ROBERT LOPEZ IV, WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, MICHAEL REAGAN, DAVID D. WEINZWEIG and UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as Does 1-10 |
| 21-16403 |
| August 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Rune Kraft Motion for miscellaneous relief [The motion for leave is essential for the Appellant to write his opening brief because it concerns the foundational issue of jurisdiction. The merits panel should first rule on the motion for leave and necessarily amend the schedule.]. Date of service: 10/21/2021. [12263996] [21-16403] (Kraft, Rune) [Entered: 10/21/2021 08:27 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): Appellants motion for leave (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]), and the responses and replies thereto, are referred to the panel assigned to decide the merits of this appeal. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12261765] (AF) [Entered: 10/19/2021 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Rune Kraft reply to response (). Date of service: 09/25/2021. [12239018] [21-16403] (Kraft, Rune) [Entered: 09/25/2021 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellee Michael Reagan response to motion ([ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 09/24/2021. [12238006] [21-16403] (Branco, Joseph) [Entered: 09/24/2021 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Rune Kraft reply to response (motion for miscellaneous relief (to be used only if no other relief applies)). Date of service: 09/24/2021. [12238004] [21-16403] (Kraft, Rune) [Entered: 09/24/2021 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellee Michael Reagan response to motion ([ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion for miscellaneous relief (to be used only if no other relief applies)). Date of service: 09/23/2021. [12237592] [21-16403] (Branco, Joseph) [Entered: 09/23/2021 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Joseph James Branco for party(s) Appellee Michael Reagan, in case 21-16403. [12236884] (DJV) [Entered: 09/23/2021 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Joseph J. Branco (Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Civil Services Division, 225 W. Madison St., Phoenix, AZ 85003) for Appellee Michael Reagan. Date of service: 09/23/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12236877] [21-16403] (Branco, Joseph) [Entered: 09/23/2021 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 09/20/2021. [12236014] (RT) [Entered: 09/22/2021 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Rune Kraft Motion for miscellaneous relief [Plaintiff hereby asks for leave to create a record adequate for review, to make definite precisely what is being decided, to inform the Court about the basis for the district court's decision, all to ensure reasoned decision making.]. Date of service: 09/22/2021. [12235847] [21-16403] (Kraft, Rune) [Entered: 09/22/2021 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12214546] (CKP) [Entered: 08/30/2021 06:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Rune Kraft opening brief due 10/25/2021. Appellees James P. Beene, Robert M. Brutinel, Kent E. Cattani, David W. Garbarino, David B. Gass, Douglas Gerlach, John Robert Lopez IV, William G. Montgomery, Michael Reagan, State of Arizona, Unknown Parties and David D. Weinzweig answering brief due 11/24/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12213213] (JMR) [Entered: 08/27/2021 09:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
