Joseph Wilson v. Phoenix Police Department, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH LAMONT WILSON
Defendant / Appellee: PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRIAN JONES, Ofc #10198, ANTHONY FINK, Ofc #09783, DUSTIN VIGESSA, Ofc #072327, JUSTIN PAINTER, Ofc #10198, MINDY BROOK, Ofc, MESQUITA, First name unknown; Sgt #8502, NELU PODEA, Detective #9381, MINDY SHOOK, Municipal Peace Officer #10134 and UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as "Legal Liason" of Phoenix Police Department #0723
Case Number: 21-16428
Filed: September 1, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2021 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Joseph Lamont Wilson statement that appeal should go forward. [12268899] (RR) [Entered: 10/26/2021 11:03 AM]
September 20, 2021 Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The motion for appointment of counsel will be addressed, if necessary, following resolution of this order. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12233214] (WL) [Entered: 09/20/2021 01:15 PM]
September 8, 2021 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Joseph Lamont Wilson motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None.. [12229746] (RR) [Entered: 09/15/2021 04:19 PM]
September 8, 2021 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Joseph Lamont Wilson motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12229738] (RR) [Entered: 09/15/2021 04:16 PM]
September 8, 2021 Filing 4 Received Appellant Joseph Lamont Wilson notice regarding Notice of Appeal, and Form 6. [12229708] (RR) [Entered: 09/15/2021 04:06 PM]
September 3, 2021 Filing 3 Received notice of change of address dated 08/18/2021 from Joseph Lamont Wilson. New address: 201 W Jefferson Ave., Phoeniz-AZ 85004 and request for forms. [12226441] (RR) [Entered: 09/13/2021 10:57 AM]
September 2, 2021 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12218839] (CKP) [Entered: 09/02/2021 11:53 AM]
September 1, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Joseph Lamont Wilson opening brief due 11/01/2021. Appellees answering brief due 11/29/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12217546] (JMR) [Entered: 09/01/2021 10:06 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joseph Wilson v. Phoenix Police Department, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JOSEPH LAMONT WILSON
Represented By: Joseph Lamont Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRIAN JONES, Ofc #10198
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANTHONY FINK, Ofc #09783
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DUSTIN VIGESSA, Ofc #072327
Represented By: Leslie Steven Tuskai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JUSTIN PAINTER, Ofc #10198
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MINDY BROOK, Ofc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MESQUITA, First name unknown; Sgt #8502
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NELU PODEA, Detective #9381
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MINDY SHOOK, Municipal Peace Officer #10134
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as "Legal Liason" of Phoenix Police Department #0723
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?