Cornelius Lopes v. Kevin DeLeon, et al
CORNELIUS LOPES |
KEVIN DELEON, NANCY PELOSI, GAVIN NEWSOM, MARIA ELENA DURAZO, ELOISE GOMEZ REYES, JOAQUIN CASTRO, JANET NAPOLITANO, TONI ATKINS, ELENI KOUNALAKIS, ROBERT HERTZBERG, SHANNON GROVE, WILLIAM SCOTT, CONNIE LEYVA, MIKE MCGUIRE, JIM NIELSEN, ERIKA CONTRERAS, KATRINA RODRIQUEZ, XAVIER BECERRA, ALEX PADILLA, Secretary of State of California, BOD ARCHULETA, LORI COX, ANISSA BASOCO-VILLAREAL, CARL GUARDINO, BRIAN BRENNAN, PATRICK YOES, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, PATRICK LYNCH and POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK |
21-16476 |
September 8, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
CORNELIUS LOPES V. KEVIN DELEON, ET AL |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing 3 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12232683] (RR) [Entered: 09/20/2021 09:18 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Mr. Cornelius Lopes document entitled "Motion on a Notice of Appeal". Deficiencies: None. [12231084] (RR) [Entered: 09/16/2021 05:19 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Cornelius Lopes opening brief due 11/08/2021. Appellees answering brief due 12/07/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12223344] (JMR) [Entered: 09/08/2021 02:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.