David Cook v. City of Antioch, et al
| DAVID LEIGH COOK |
| CITY OF ANTIOCH, TOM BROOKS, Chief of Police, TORRESS, Officer, DOWLING, Officer, TAMMANY BROOKS, Chief of Police, Antioch Police Department, MARCOS TORRES, Badge No. 5320; Antioch Police Officer, JOHN COX, Badge No. 5705; Antioch Policer Officer, J. DOWNIE, Badge No. 5557; Antioch Police Officer, AKA Jonathan Downie, OLLIE SANSEN, Badge No. 0392; Concord Police Officer, JUAN PICENO, Badge No. 0521; Concord Police Officer, DANIEL BERINGER, Badge No. 0567; Concord Police Officer, JOHN RAMIREZ, Badge No. 5320, MARTIN HYNES, Badge No. 41Martin Hynes Badge No. 4164 64, JENNIFER LEE, Antioch Police Dispatch Officer, CARRIE MOORE, Antioch Police Dispatch Officer and ELIZABETH SCOTT, Antioch Police Dispatch Officer, #5299 |
| 21-16478 |
| September 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail returned on 10/25/2021 addressed to David Leigh Cook, re: [ # 3 ] Mandate. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, not at this facility, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward. Resending to: RRM Sacramento, RESIDENTIAL REENTRY OFFICE, 501 I Street, Suite 9-400, Sacramento, CA 95814. [12277619]--[Edited: address updated. 11/03/2021 by SLM] (LA) [Entered: 11/03/2021 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED.(MDH, PJW and KKL) [12251821] (JFF) [Entered: 10/08/2021 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, PAUL J. WATFORD and KENNETH K. LEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)); see also Silberkleit v. Kantrowitz, 713 F.2d 433, 434 (9th Cir. 1983) (order granting or denying a stay of proceedings is not generally a final decision appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291). DISMISSED. [12230914] (JMR) [Entered: 09/16/2021 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant David Leigh Cook opening brief due 11/02/2021. Appellees Marcos Torres, et al answering brief due 12/02/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12224092] (JPD) [Entered: 09/09/2021 10:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
