Olga Alexander v. City of Brisbane, et al
| OLGA C. ALEXANDER, On Behalf of Herself and On Behalf of Her Minor Children V.A.; T.A. as Guardian Ad Litem |
| CITY OF BRISBANE, ROBERT MALONE, in his individual capacity, ABRAHAM SEVILLA, LISA MACIAS, (DOE 1) - In Her Individual Capacity, MARIO GARCIA, (DOE 2) - In His Individual Capacity and TIMOTHY ALEXANDER, (DOE 3) - In His Individual Capacity |
| 21-16526 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to pay fees. This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [12275814] (CKP) [Entered: 11/02/2021 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12233529] (CKP) [Entered: 09/20/2021 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 10/15/2021. Transcript due 11/15/2021. Appellant Olga C. Alexander opening brief due 12/27/2021. Appellees Timothy Alexander, City of Brisbane, Mario Garcia, Lisa Macias, Robert Malone and Abraham Sevilla answering brief due 01/26/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12230316] (JBS) [Entered: 09/16/2021 10:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
