Nannette Hummel v. Maricopa County Adult Probatio, et al
NANNETTE G. HUMMEL |
MARICOPA COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT and MICHAEL CIMINO, Chief Probation Officer, Adult Probation Department, Superior Court of Arizona in and for Maricopa County, in his official capacity |
21-16548 |
September 21, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
NANNETTE HUMMEL V. MARICOPA CNTY. ADULT PROBATION DEP'T, ET AL |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Nannette G. Hummel motion for request for trial Transcript at no cost. Deficiencies: None. [12268653] (JFF) [Entered: 10/26/2021 09:39 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Nannette G. Hummel motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12268642] (JFF) [Entered: 10/26/2021 09:36 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. The Clerk will update the docket to reflect this status. The opening brief is due December 3, 2021. The answering brief is due January 3, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellees must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. See id. (MOATT) [12262564] (OC) [Entered: 10/20/2021 10:14 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Nannette G. Hummel motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12255023] (JFF) [Entered: 10/13/2021 09:00 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12235745] (CKP) [Entered: 09/22/2021 11:43 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 10/18/2021. Transcript due 11/16/2021. Appellant Nannette G. Hummel opening brief due 12/27/2021. Appellees Michael Cimino and Maricopa County Adult Probation Department answering brief due 01/27/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12234650] (RT) [Entered: 09/21/2021 12:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Nannette Hummel v. Maricopa County Adult Probatio, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: NANNETTE G. HUMMEL | |
Represented By: | Nannette G. Hummel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: MARICOPA COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT | |
Represented By: | Ann Ruth Hobart Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: MICHAEL CIMINO, Chief Probation Officer, Adult Probation Department, Superior Court of Arizona in and for Maricopa County, in his official capacity | |
Represented By: | Ann Ruth Hobart Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.