GP Vincent II v. The Estate of Edgar Beard, Dec, et al
| GP VINCENT II, a Delaware limited liability company |
| THE ESTATE OF EDGAR BEARD, DECEASED, an individual, THE ESTATE OF NORMA BEARD, DECEASED, an individual and ETCH-TEK, INC., a dissolved California corporation |
| 21-16555 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 GP VINCENT II V. THE ESTATE OF EDGAR BEARD, ET AL
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - Video Conference, 02/23/2022, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12283579] (CL) [Entered: 11/09/2021 06:06 PM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 12/01/2021. See order for details. [12283570] (CL) [Entered: 11/09/2021 05:55 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 11/09/2021, 12:30 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12261895] (BLS) [Entered: 10/19/2021 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 09/30/2021. [12252213] (RT) [Entered: 10/08/2021 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 6 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-16555: Paid] ). [12251842] (TYL) [Entered: 10/08/2021 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 10/19/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12246743] (BLS) [Entered: 10/04/2021 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/29/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12243333]. [21-16555] (AD) [Entered: 09/29/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant GP Vincent II Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/29/2021. [12242682] [21-16555] (Paget, Brian) [Entered: 09/29/2021 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant GP Vincent II Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/29/2021. Transcript ordered by 10/21/2021. Transcript due 11/22/2021. Appellant GP Vincent II opening brief due 12/30/2021. Appellees Etch-Tek, Inc., The Estate of Edgar Beard, Deceased and The Estate of Norma Beard, Deceased answering brief due 01/31/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12235724] (RT) [Entered: 09/22/2021 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS and KENNETH K. LEE, Circuit Judges) in case no. 21-80095 on September 21, 2021: Petition No. 21-80095 for permission to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) is granted. Within 14 days after the date of this order, petitioner shall perfect the appeal in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d). Petition No. 21-80074 is denied as moot. [12235714] (RT) [Entered: 09/22/2021 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
