Pablo Guerrero v. Brian Williams, et al
| PABLO RAMON GUERRERO |
| BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA |
| 21-16586 |
| September 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MANDATE ISSUED. (MMM, WAF and JSB) [12279159] (NAC) [Entered: 11/05/2021 07:33 AM] |
| Filing 5 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 10/22/2021. [12269971] (RT) [Entered: 10/27/2021 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Pablo Ramon Guerrero letter re: attorney. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12257380] (NAC) [Entered: 10/14/2021 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JAY S. BYBEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the August 23, 2021 post-judgment order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. The August 23, 2021 post-judgment order reopened district court proceedings, and did not finally decide appellants July 22, 2021 motions. Because the post-judgment proceedings remain pending in the district court, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12257162] (JPD) [Entered: 10/14/2021 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received Appellant Pablo Ramon Guerrero notice regarding Notice of Appeal. [12248663] (RR) [Entered: 10/05/2021 05:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12241627] (RT) [Entered: 09/28/2021 01:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
