Curtis Thornton v. City of Daly City, et al
CURTIS THORNTON |
CITY OF DALY CITY, a municipality, IAN MADDISON, PAUL MENDIARA, JONATHAN PREMENKO, PATRICK HENSLEY, Daly City Police Department Chief, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, CHEN FENG, STEPHEN WAGSTAFFE, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GONSALVES, Officer, KENNAN, Sergeant, HNA GROUP, GATE GOURMET and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, San Francisco Office |
21-16589 |
September 28, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Filed order (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JAY S. BYBEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the September 24, 2021 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); see also United States v. Washington, 573 F.2d 1121, 1122 (9th Cir. 1978) (order denying motion to disqualify judge is not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12257243] (JPD) [Entered: 10/14/2021 01:42 PM] |
Filing 3 Attorney Brian D. Berry in 21-16589 substituted by Attorney Cara Barrick in 21-16589 [12255307] (NAC) [Entered: 10/13/2021 10:47 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Cara F. Barrick (Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. One Embarcadero Center, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94111) for Appellee Gate Gourmet. Substitution for Attorney Brian D. Berry for Appellee Gate Gourmet. Date of service: 10/13/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12255293] [21-16589] (Barrick, Cara) [Entered: 10/13/2021 10:43 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Curtis Thornton opening brief due 11/23/2021. Appellees answering brief due 12/23/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12241693] (JMR) [Entered: 09/28/2021 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.