Raymond Healey v. Kim Adamson, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAYMOND HEALEY
Defendant / Appellee: KIM ADAMSON, BRIAN EGERTON, MICHAEL MINEV and CONNELLY, Nurse
Case Number: 21-16614
Filed: October 1, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2021 Filing 6 Streamlined request by Appellant Raymond Healey to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Raymond Healey opening brief due 12/29/2021. Appellees Kim Adamson, Connelly, Brian Egerton and Michael Minev answering brief due 01/28/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12298805] (DLM) [Entered: 11/26/2021 04:14 PM]
October 25, 2021 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Raymond Healey letter dated 10/20/2021 re: second notice of proof of payment. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12268454] (DJV) [Entered: 10/26/2021 08:03 AM]
October 21, 2021 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Raymond Healey letter dated 10/18/2021 re: re: payment of docket fees. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12264716] (DJV) [Entered: 10/21/2021 02:34 PM]
October 14, 2021 Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 10/12/2021. [12256583] (RT) [Entered: 10/14/2021 09:09 AM]
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12247039] (CKP) [Entered: 10/04/2021 04:11 PM]
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raymond Healey opening brief due 11/29/2021. Appellees Brian Egerton and Michael Minev answering brief due 12/29/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12244885] (JPD) [Entered: 10/01/2021 11:23 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Raymond Healey v. Kim Adamson, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RAYMOND HEALEY
Represented By: Raymond Healey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KIM ADAMSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRIAN EGERTON
Represented By: Douglas Reed Rands Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICHAEL MINEV
Represented By: Douglas Reed Rands Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CONNELLY, Nurse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?