Mary Bernstein, et al v. USHUD, et al
MARY HELEN BERNSTEIN, ELIZABETH GRACE TIGANO and MARY BALLARD BERNSTEIN |
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING, a California state agency, BEN CARSON, Secreatry, Department of Housing & Urban Development, PAUL - SMITH, KEVIN RICHARD KISH, CHERIE DOUGLAS, CLAUDIA LOPEZ, RICARDO REYES, JAMES CORTES, SHAYNAH WILLIAMS, BRYAN GREENE, ROSALIND EVANS, MARIA GONZALES, LAREECEIA HARRIS, ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, PAUL D. HERBERT, TARA DESAUTELS, BRAD SELIGMAN, BENTRISH SATARZADEH, JEFFREY BRAND, PATRICK RICHARD MCKINNEY II, PELAYO LLAMAS and TAMIZA HOCKENHULL |
21-16639 |
October 6, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mrs. Mary Ballard Bernstein Correspondence: Statement going forward required response to docket 9. The exhibits demonstrate the volatile environment police reports, fire reports violent nature these residents.. Date of service: 12/03/2021 [12305705] [21-16639] (Bernstein, Mary) [Entered: 12/03/2021 07:15 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mrs. Mary Ballard Bernstein Correspondence: This is a response to court order requiring preparation of statement appeal to go forward. It is unclear what category to file this required statement Docket item 9. I filed this with many exhibits a few minutes ago but do not see on the docket.. Date of service: 12/03/2021 [12305701] [21-16639] (Bernstein, Mary) [Entered: 12/03/2021 06:55 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12300488] (CKP) [Entered: 11/29/2021 04:43 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mrs. Mary Ballard Bernstein Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Form 4). Date of service: 11/25/2021. [12298326] [21-16639] (Bernstein, Mary) [Entered: 11/25/2021 06:25 AM] |
Filing 7 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12278552] (CKP) [Entered: 11/04/2021 01:51 PM] |
Filing 6 Received 1 additional paper copies of motions [3], [4], [4], [5], [5] by Appellants Mrs. Mary Helen Bernstein and Elizabeth Grace Tigano. [12269215] (KWG) [Entered: 10/26/2021 01:34 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed UNDER SEAL Appellants Mrs. Mary Helen Bernstein and Elizabeth Grace Tigano motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief until 06/17/2022. Deficiencies: No certificate of service. [12256093]--[COURT UPDATE: updated docket text to indicate no certificate of service. 10/13/2021 by KT] (KT) [Entered: 10/13/2021 03:39 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed UNDER SEAL Appellants Mrs. Mary Helen Bernstein and Elizabeth Grace Tigano motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: No certificate of service [12256090]--[COURT UPDATE: updated docket text to indicate no certificate of service. 10/13/2021 by KT] (KT) [Entered: 10/13/2021 03:38 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed UNDER SEAL Appellants Mrs. Mary Helen Bernstein and Elizabeth Grace Tigano motion to file UNDER SEAL motion for appointment of counsel and motion for extension of time. Deficiencies: No certificate of service. [12256083]--[COURT UPDATE: updated docket text to indicate no certificate of service. 10/13/2021 by KT]--[Edited 10/13/2021 by KT] (KT) [Entered: 10/13/2021 03:36 PM] |
Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12249725] (JFF) [Entered: 10/06/2021 03:05 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Mary Helen Bernstein and Elizabeth Grace Tigano opening brief due 12/08/2021. Appellees Alameda County Superior Court, Jeffrey Brand, California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, Ben Carson, James Cortes, Tara Desautels, Cherie Douglas, Rosalind Evans, Maria Gonzales, Bryan Greene, Lareeceia Harris, Paul D. Herbert, Tamiza Hockenhull, Kevin Richard Kish, Pelayo Llamas, Claudia Lopez, Patrick Richard McKinney II, Ricardo Reyes, Bentrish Satarzadeh, Brad Seligman, Paul - Smith, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and Shaynah Williams answering brief due 01/10/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12249061] (RT) [Entered: 10/06/2021 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.