Devin Andrich v. State Bar of Arizona, et al
| DEVIN ANDRICH |
| STATE BAR OF ARIZONA and STACY LYNN SHUMAN |
| 21-16658 |
| October 7, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 11/01/2021. [12275887] (RT) [Entered: 11/02/2021 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorneys Lisa T. Hauser and Carrie Ann Laliberte substituted by Attorney William F. King. [12268156] (RL) [Entered: 10/25/2021 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of William F. King (Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint, P.C., 2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016) for Appellees Stacy Lynn Shuman and State Bar of Arizona. Substitution for Lisa T. Hauser for Appellees Stacy Lynn Shuman and State Bar of Arizona and Carrie Ann Laliberte for Appellees Stacy Lynn Shuman and State Bar of Arizona. Date of service: 10/25/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12267610] [21-16658] (King, William) [Entered: 10/25/2021 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12257856] (CKP) [Entered: 10/14/2021 04:48 PM] |
Filing 1
DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Devin Andrich opening brief due 12/08/2021. Appellees Stacy Lynn Shuman and State Bar of Arizona answering brief due 01/10/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12250934] (RT) [Entered: 10/07/2021 01:48 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
