Tanya McDaniel v. USA, et al
| TANYA GRACE MCDANIEL |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CITY OF DAVIS, YOLO COUNTY, RITA F. DURGIN, CURRY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, GAVIN NEWSOM, DAN WOLK, Judge, DOJ, RIVAS, Legislator, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and LESTER HAYES |
| 21-16664 |
| October 7, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (SANDRA S. IKUTA, JOHN B. OWENS and MARK J. BENNETT) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court has not issued any orders that are final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Nascimento v. Dummer, 508 F.3d 905, 908 (9th Cir. 2007) (transfer orders are not directly appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12282686] (JBS) [Entered: 11/09/2021 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12258277] (NAC) [Entered: 10/15/2021 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tanya Grace McDaniel opening brief due 12/10/2021. Appellees California, City of Davis, City of Sacramento, City of San Francisco, Curry, DOJ, Rita F. Durgin, Kamala D. Harris, Lester Hayes, National Football League, Gavin Newsom, Rivas, United States of America, Dan Wolk and Yolo County answering brief due 01/10/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12251434] (RT) [Entered: 10/07/2021 04:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
