William Whitsitt v. City of Stockton, et al
| WILLIAM J. WHITSITT |
| CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, KELLY MORRIS, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, NICKY MORRIS, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MEWHINNEY, A. LIZARDO, CHRISTENSEN, JOHN AFANSASIEV and MORGAN T. FAWVER |
| 21-16670 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| WILLIAM WHITSITT V. CITY OF STOCKTON, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12254299] (CKP) [Entered: 10/12/2021 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant William J. Whitsitt opening brief due 12/10/2021. [12252092] (RT) [Entered: 10/08/2021 11:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
