Brent Duke v. David Shinn, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: BRENT FITZGERALD DUKE
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Case Number: 21-16675
Filed: October 8, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2021 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Brent Fitzgerald Duke motion for Inspector General annual report. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12282041] (RR) [Entered: 11/08/2021 06:46 PM]
November 1, 2021 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Brent Fitzgerald Duke motion for leave. Deficiencies: None. [12276550] (RR) [Entered: 11/02/2021 07:08 PM]
November 1, 2021 Filing 7 Received notice of change of address dated 10/30/2021 from Brent Fitzgerald Duke. New address: ASPC-Eyman/Rynning Unit, P.O. Box 3100, Florence AZ 85132-3100. [12276546]--[Edited: address updated. 11/03/2021 by SLM] (RR) [Entered: 11/02/2021 07:00 PM]
October 22, 2021 Filing 6 Received Appellant Brent Fitzgerald Duke notice of appeal of Doc 22 Interlocutory order and motion for leave of Court to appeal, Doc 22. Notice of (cm/ecf docket #23). See Court's order filed 10/19/2021. [12266308] (RR) [Entered: 10/22/2021 03:57 PM]
October 19, 2021 Filing 5 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: DA) This appeal No. 21-16675 is dismissed as duplicative of closed appeal No. 21-15678. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court for appeal No. 21-16675. [12262175] (JMR) [Entered: 10/19/2021 04:54 PM]
October 14, 2021 Filing 4 Received Appellant Brent Fitzgerald Duke notice of appeal of Doc 22 Interlocutory order and motion for leave of Court to appeal, Doc 22. Notice of (cm/ecf docket #23) [12259042] (RR) [Entered: 10/15/2021 04:17 PM]
October 14, 2021 Filing 3 Received copy of motion filed in Navajo County Superior Court Division One re: Defendant's motion for keave of Court in which to ask Plaintiff to re-file their June 23,2021 docket order for Plaintt's open extntion of time to reply by November 15, 2021 of Doc. 23 of (cm/ecf docket #24) Motion filed by Appellant Brent Fitzgerald Duke. [12259031] (RR) [Entered: 10/15/2021 04:12 PM]
October 14, 2021 Filing 2 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Brent Fitzgerald Duke opening brief of 34 pages (Informal: No). Served on 10/14/2021. Major deficiency: no briefing schedule. [12257269] (KWG) [Entered: 10/14/2021 01:53 PM]
October 8, 2021 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12252382] (RT) [Entered: 10/08/2021 02:20 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Brent Duke v. David Shinn, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: BRENT FITZGERALD DUKE
Represented By: Brent Fitzgerald Duke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?