Dejuan Hopson v. Jacob Alexander, et al
| CHRISTEN ROPE, JOSHUA LEOU and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Doe #1, Officer, Mesa Police Department / substituted with Christen Rope per document 9; named as John Doe #2, Officer, Mesa Police Department / substituted with Joshua Leou per document 9; named as John Doe #3, Officer |
| DEJUAN MARKEISS HOPSON |
| JACOB ALEXANDER and BRANDON GRISSOM |
| 21-16706 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 DEJUAN HOPSON V. JACOB ALEXANDER, ET AL
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 5 ] submitted by Jacob Alexander and Brandon Grissom is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 6 ] submitted by Jacob Alexander and Brandon Grissom are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12314268] (KWG) [Entered: 12/13/2021 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Jacob Alexander and Brandon Grissom. Date of service: 12/13/2021. [12313371] [21-16706] (Lindvall, Alexander) [Entered: 12/13/2021 07:15 AM] |
| Filing 5 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Jacob Alexander and Brandon Grissom. Date of service: 12/13/2021. [12313369] [21-16706] (Lindvall, Alexander) [Entered: 12/13/2021 07:14 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Samuel David Kinder Weiss (Rights Behind Bars. 416 Florida Avenue NW, Unit 26152. Washington, DC 20001.) for Appellee Dejuan Markeiss Hopson. Substitution for Party Dejuan Markeiss Hopson. Date of service: 11/19/2021. (Party was previously proceeding pro se.) [12293430] [21-16706] (Weiss, Samuel) [Entered: 11/19/2021 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jacob Alexander and Brandon Grissom response to order to show cause dated 12/07/2021. Date of service: 11/18/2021. [12291151] [21-16706] (Lindvall, Alexander) [Entered: 11/18/2021 07:17 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the qualified immunity issue on appeal appears to turn on disputed facts, not on a question of law. See Villanueva v. California, 986 F.3d 1158, 1164 (9th Cir. 2021) (court of appeals has jurisdiction over interlocutory appeal from denial of qualified immunity only to the extent that it turns on an issue of law) (citation omitted); Pauluk v. Savage, 836 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir. 2016). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12289226] (AF) [Entered: 11/16/2021 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Jacob Alexander and Brandon Grissom opening brief due 12/13/2021. Appellee Dejuan Markeiss Hopson answering brief due 01/11/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12258733] (JPD) [Entered: 10/15/2021 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
