USA v. Steven Zinnel, et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| DAVID ZINNEL |
| STEVEN ZINNEL |
| 21-16737 |
| October 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12310068] (WL) [Entered: 12/08/2021 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Steven Zinnel motion to consolidate. Deficiencies: None [12300965] (JFF) [Entered: 11/30/2021 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Steven Zinnel motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12300960] (JFF) [Entered: 11/30/2021 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 3 Terminated Kurt Didier for USA in 21-16737 [12294540] (JFF) [Entered: 11/22/2021 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA Correspondence: Removal of Counsel from Clerk's Docket and Service List. Date of service: 11/19/2021 [12293649] [21-16737] (Ernce, Lynn) [Entered: 11/19/2021 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Steven Zinnel opening brief due 12/20/2021. Appellees United States of America and David Zinnel answering brief due 01/20/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12261909] (RT) [Entered: 10/19/2021 03:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
