Robert Lindblad v. United States Government, et al
| ROBERT LINDBLAD |
| UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, CIVIL PROCESS CLERK UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM, SENATOR ELIZABETH WARREN, SENATOR MARSHA BLACKBURN, U.S. SENATOR MITCH MCCONNELL, SENATOR DANIEL SCOTT SULLIVAN, DONALD J. TRUMP, SENATOR NANCY PELOSI, HARRY CHARLES, Former Duke Prince, MEGAN MARKLE, Former Duchess, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, United States High Officer, JILL BIDEN, 2nd Lady (1st Neilia Hunter Biden '72), TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, MILLBRAE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, SENATOE CHARLES E. SCHUMER, Chuck, SENATOR LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska, JOHN COOPER, Owner Millbrae Storage, DOES, 15 Unknown-name Agents; Colorado/California law enforcement or former agents, DOES, Chinese Intelligence 10 unknown members and JOHN DOE, District Court Judge for this suit |
| 21-16754 |
| October 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Robert Lindblad motion to proceed on appeal In Forma Pauperis; FORM 4. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/09/2021. [12284665] (RL) [Entered: 11/10/2021 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12269588] (CKP) [Entered: 10/26/2021 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 10/26/2021 ORDER re: In Forma Pauperis. The Court finds that Plaintiffs appeal is frivolous as it has no arguable basis in fact or law. OLoughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 617 (9th Cir. 1990) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). It is therefore not taken in good faith within the meaning of 1915(a)(3). See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk shall transmit a copy of this order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. IT IS SO ORDERED. [12269253] (RL) [Entered: 10/26/2021 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12265801] (CKP) [Entered: 10/22/2021 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Robert Lindblad opening brief due 12/20/2021. [12264614] (JMR) [Entered: 10/21/2021 01:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
