Emmanuel Williams v. Z. Austen
| EMMANUEL DONTEZE WILLIAMS |
| CORRECTION OFFICER Z. AUSTEN, P.B.S.P. |
| 21-16755 |
| October 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): On October 22, 2021, this court ordered appellant to complete and file with this court the enclosed authorization form. To date, appellant has not complied with the courts order. Although appellants forma pauperis status continues in this court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), incarcerated appellants proceeding in forma pauperis must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees when funds are available in appellants account. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall have one final opportunity to sign and file with this court the enclosed authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellants trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) and (e)(2). Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellants prison trust account total less than $10.00, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12311810] (CKP) [Entered: 12/09/2021 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 Streamlined request by Appellant Emmanuel Donteze Williams to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Emmanuel Donteze Williams opening brief due 01/18/2022. Appellee Z. Austen answering brief due 02/17/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12309132] (JN) [Entered: 12/07/2021 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12265806] (CKP) [Entered: 10/22/2021 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Emmanuel Donteze Williams opening brief due 12/17/2021. Appellee Z. Austen answering brief due 01/18/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12264628] (JMR) [Entered: 10/21/2021 01:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Emmanuel Williams v. Z. Austen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: EMMANUEL DONTEZE WILLIAMS | |
| Represented By: | Emmanuel Donteze Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CORRECTION OFFICER Z. AUSTEN, P.B.S.P. | |
| Represented By: | Cassandra Jean Shryock Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
