Jesus Chiprez v. M. Spearman, et al
| JESUS CHIPREZ |
| M. E. SPEARMAN, M. HUDSON, C. MOSS, THOMPSON and BAUTISTAR |
| 21-16757 |
| October 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (SSI, JBO and MJB) [12302079] (RL) [Entered: 12/01/2021 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (SANDRA S. IKUTA, JOHN B. OWENS and MARK J. BENNETT) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the magistrate judges June 4, 2021 report and recommendation challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A review of the record reflects that, to date, appellant has not filed a new notice of appeal from the district courts final judgment entered on November 8, 2021. DISMISSED. [12283016] (OC) [Entered: 11/09/2021 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12265439] (RL) [Entered: 10/22/2021 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jesus Chiprez opening brief due 12/17/2021.[12264828] (JMR) [Entered: 10/21/2021 03:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
