Shaykh Muhammad Al Saud v. Travis Scott, et al
| SHAYKH MUHAMMAD ABDUL BIN TALAL AL SAUD, AKA Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud |
| TRAVIS SCOTT, NATHANIEL HARRIS, #1495, DAVID SHINN, Director, PAMALA OLMSTEAD, BREWER, First name unknown; Captain SMUII, A21 Eyman Complex, SERRATO, First name unknown; Sgt SMUII A21 Eyman, KENNETH HERMAN, Director, Religious Service, MARQUEZ, First name unknown; COII - SMUII A21 Eyman Complex, DE LA CRUZ, First name unknown; CO III #2044, ADAM HENRY, Senior Chaplain and MALVIN WILLIS, Senior Chaplain |
| 21-16787 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 11/08/2021). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [12307230] (CKP) [Entered: 12/06/2021 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): Appellants notice of appeal dated October 20, 2021 appears to challenge the magistrate judges October 6, 2021 order. A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the October 6, 2021 magistrate judge order challenged in the notice of appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12281813] (CKP) [Entered: 11/08/2021 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Bin Talal Al Saud motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12280036] (NAC) [Entered: 11/05/2021 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Bin Talal Al Saud opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 11/05/2021 by Court via CM/ECF. [12280022] (LA) [Entered: 11/05/2021 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Bin Talal Al Saud opening brief due 12/27/2021. Appellees Brewer, De La Cruz, Nathaniel Harris, Adam Henry, Kenneth Herman, Marquez, Pamala Olmstead, Travis Scott, Serrato, David Shinn, Director and Malvin Willis answering brief due 01/27/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12269099] (RT) [Entered: 10/26/2021 12:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
