Michael Aguilar v. Gene Coca, et al
| MICHAEL EDWARD AGUILAR |
| GENE COCA, Correctional Officer IV at ASPC - Safford/Tonto Unit, ROXANNE HILL, Deputy Warden at ASPC - Safford/Tonto Unit, VANCE LARKIN, Captain, ASPC - Safford, MICHAEL ENNIS, Captain, ASPC Safford, STACI IBARRA and KIMBERLY CURRIER |
| 21-16789 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| MICHAEL AGUILAR V. GENE COCA, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Michael Edward Aguilar statement that appeal should go forward. [12317481] (NAC) [Entered: 12/16/2021 07:16 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Michael Edward Aguilar motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 11/03/2021. Deficiencies: None. [12312709] (NAC) [Entered: 12/10/2021 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 8 Received notice of change of address dated 12/06/2021 from Michael Edward Aguilar. New address: 1034 South Herbert Ave, Tucson, AZ 85701. [12312708]--[Edited: address updated. 12/10/2021 by SLM] (NAC) [Entered: 12/10/2021 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Michael Edward Aguilar letter dated 11/08/2021 re: docket entry #5. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12287591] (NAC) [Entered: 11/15/2021 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Michael Edward Aguilar motion to reconsider Clerk order of the Court filed on 11/03/2021. Deficiencies: None. [12280696] (NAC) [Entered: 11/08/2021 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The motion for appointment of counsel will be resolved, if necessary, following resolution of this order. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12277637] (RT) [Entered: 11/03/2021 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Michael Edward Aguilar motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12274498] (NAC) [Entered: 11/01/2021 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Michael Edward Aguilar motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None [12274494] (NAC) [Entered: 11/01/2021 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12269544] (CKP) [Entered: 10/26/2021 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Edward Aguilar opening brief due 12/27/2021. [12269299] (JPD) [Entered: 10/26/2021 02:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
