Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. Maricopa County Superior Court, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Respondent / Appellee: MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Case Number: 21-16805
Filed: October 27, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2021 Filing 27 Received notice of change of address from Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson. New address: Legal Access Monitor, Mail Code 481, Phoenix, AZ 85003. [12313260] (QDL) [Entered: 12/10/2021 05:18 PM]
December 10, 2021 Filing 26 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson motion to recite jurisdiction on the record. Deficiencies: None. [12312903] (QDL) [Entered: 12/10/2021 02:40 PM]
December 10, 2021 Filing 25 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson EMERGENCY motion to transfer/consolidate court record. Deficiencies: None. [12312899] (QDL) [Entered: 12/10/2021 02:39 PM]
December 8, 2021 Filing 24 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RICHARD C. TALLMAN): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment entered on December 2, 2021. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12310393] (AF) [Entered: 12/08/2021 02:52 PM]
December 7, 2021 Filing 23 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson letter dated 12/01/2021 re: request for case status. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12309381] (DJV) [Entered: 12/08/2021 07:32 AM]
November 29, 2021 Filing 20 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson EMERGENCY motion for oath and affirmation. Deficiencies: None. Served on. [12300498] (JFF) [Entered: 11/29/2021 04:47 PM]
November 26, 2021 Filing 22 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson emergency motion for judicial jurisprudence; judicial discretion. Deficiencies: None. [12300574] (RR) [Entered: 11/29/2021 05:49 PM]
November 26, 2021 Filing 21 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson emergency motion for judicial jurisprudence; judicial discretion. Deficiencies: None. [12300568] (RR) [Entered: 11/29/2021 05:42 PM]
November 24, 2021 Filing 19 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson EMERGENCY motion to correct docket text. Deficiencies: None. [12299249] (JFF) [Entered: 11/29/2021 09:15 AM]
November 19, 2021 Filing 18 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson motion ex party motion for court forms, rules and address. Deficiencies: None. Served on. [12294701]--[Edited: address updated. 11/22/2021 by SLM] (JFF) [Entered: 11/22/2021 10:36 AM]
November 19, 2021 Filing 17 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson supplemental emergency motion. Deficiencies: None. [12294688] (JFF) [Entered: 11/22/2021 10:31 AM]
November 19, 2021 Filing 16 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson supplemental motion. Deficiencies: None. [12294672] (JFF) [Entered: 11/22/2021 10:27 AM]
November 19, 2021 Filing 15 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson supplemental to emergency motion. Deficiencies: None. [12294664] (JFF) [Entered: 11/22/2021 10:24 AM]
November 19, 2021 Filing 14 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson motion to correct party listing. Deficiencies: None. [12294606] (JFF) [Entered: 11/22/2021 10:01 AM]
November 19, 2021 Filing 13 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson EMERGENCY motion to stay. Deficiencies: None. [12294586] (JFF) [Entered: 11/22/2021 09:57 AM]
November 17, 2021 Filing 12 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson motion for a resolution. Deficiencies: None. [12291008] (JFF) [Entered: 11/17/2021 05:02 PM]
November 17, 2021 Filing 11 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson EMERGENCY motion for status. Deficiencies: None. Served on. [12290939] (JFF) [Entered: 11/17/2021 04:31 PM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 10 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson motion to correct party listing and request for party listing. Deficiencies: None. . [12288690] (JFF) [Entered: 11/16/2021 11:09 AM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson amended motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. [12288684] (JFF) [Entered: 11/16/2021 11:05 AM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson EMERGENCY motion for injunctive relief pending appeal. Deficiencies: None. [12288675] (JFF) [Entered: 11/16/2021 11:03 AM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson motion second to correct listing. Deficiencies: None. [12287436] (JFF) [Entered: 11/15/2021 02:06 PM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson motion for disclosure. Deficiencies: None. [12287431] (JFF) [Entered: 11/15/2021 02:05 PM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson motion to include as legal expenses. Deficiencies: None. [12287424] (JFF) [Entered: 11/15/2021 02:03 PM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson motion for order. Deficiencies: None. [12287418] (JFF) [Entered: 11/15/2021 02:02 PM]
November 10, 2021 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson motion for court approved forms, rules, etc. Deficiencies: None. Served on. [12284377] (JFF) [Entered: 11/10/2021 01:42 PM]
November 9, 2021 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. [12284041] (JFF) [Entered: 11/10/2021 11:22 AM]
October 27, 2021 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12270846] (JBS) [Entered: 10/27/2021 03:20 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. Maricopa County Superior Court, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Represented By: Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director
Represented By: Joshua Cannon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Represented By: Joshua Cannon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?