Robert Leeds v. Perry Russell, et al
| ROBERT MARC LEEDS |
| PERRY RUSSELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA |
| 21-16813 |
| October 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 ROBERT LEEDS V. PERRY RUSSELL, ET AL
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Streamlined request [2] by Appellants Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Perry Russell to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Perry Russell opening brief due 01/27/2022. Appellee Robert Marc Leeds answering brief due 02/28/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12323469] (JN) [Entered: 12/22/2021 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Perry Russell. New requested due date is 01/27/2022. [12323459] [21-16813] (Serreze, Sheryl) [Entered: 12/22/2021 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Perry Russell opening brief due 12/28/2021. Appellee Robert Marc Leeds answering brief due 01/28/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12271875] (RT) [Entered: 10/28/2021 01:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
