Arthur Garrison v. A. Gregerson, et al
| ARTHUR LEE GARRISON |
| A. GREGERSON, D. NEVEN, ROMEO ARANAS, MATUSAK, MELLISSA MITCHELL, RUSSELL M. PERRY, GUY BROWN, JULIE MATOUSEK, MICHAEL KOEHN, Dr., SCOTT MANTHEI, Dr. and SCOTT MORTINSON |
| 21-16871 |
| November 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (DFO, SRT and RCT) [12326779] (QDL) [Entered: 12/29/2021 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal, dated October 28, 2021 and filed on November 1, 2021, was not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on August 9, 2021. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12308861] (JBS) [Entered: 12/07/2021 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Arthur Lee Garrison opening brief due 01/03/2022. Appellees Romeo Aranas, Guy Brown, A. Gregerson, Michael Koehn, Scott Manthei, Julie Matousek, Matusak, Mellissa Mitchell, Scott Mortinson, D. Neven and Russell M. Perry answering brief due 02/03/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12278717] (RT) [Entered: 11/04/2021 03:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
