Antony Murrell v. Karanga Adams, et al
ANTONY T. MURRELL |
KARANGA GRACE ADAMS, Medical Provider, D. LARSON, Correctional Officer IV, CENTURION OF ARIZONA, MICHAEL GOTTFRIED, named as Micheal Gottfried, Assistant Attorney General, JANAH BARRERAS, LORESCA PERDUE, ROGER HALL, JOSEPH SCOTT CONLON, RENAUD DRURY COOK AND BOYER PA, ANTHONY FERNANDEZ, DAVID SHINN, Director, STRUCK LOVE BOJANOWSKI & ACEDO PLC, BROENIG O'BERG WOODS & WILSON LAW FIRM, SARAH L. BARNES, DANIEL PATRICK STRUCK and CORIZON |
21-16885 |
November 8, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Antony T. Murrell motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12300141] (NAC) [Entered: 11/29/2021 03:06 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Antony T. Murrell motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12300139] (NAC) [Entered: 11/29/2021 03:05 PM] |
Filing 3 Received notice of change of address dated 11/12/2021 from Antony T. Murrell. New address: ASPC Yuma Cibola, P.O. Box 8909, San Luis, AZ 85349. [12299113] --[Edited: Updated Address. 11/29/2021 by TYL] (NAC) [Entered: 11/28/2021 07:50 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12280964] (CKP) [Entered: 11/08/2021 10:52 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Antony T. Murrell opening brief due 01/03/2022. [12280605] (WL) [Entered: 11/08/2021 08:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.