Colleen Courtney v. Housing Authority Kings County, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: COLLEEN MARIE COURTNEY
Defendant / Appellee: HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING
Case Number: 21-16887
Filed: November 8, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2021 Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (DFO, SRT and RCT) [12327604] (NAC) [Entered: 12/30/2021 07:17 AM]
December 8, 2021 Filing 4 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the October 18, 2021 magistrate judge order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court); see also Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1330 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12310120] (JMR) [Entered: 12/08/2021 01:38 PM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Ms. Colleen Marie Courtney motion for correction of party's listings, for recalculation of appellant's time schedule order, extension of time, for judicial answer to question. Deficiencies: None. [12287600] (NAC) [Entered: 11/15/2021 02:49 PM]
November 9, 2021 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Ms. Colleen Marie Courtney motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None [12283255] (NAC) [Entered: 11/09/2021 03:24 PM]
November 8, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Colleen Marie Courtney opening brief due 01/04/2022. [12280965] (JBS) [Entered: 11/08/2021 10:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Colleen Courtney v. Housing Authority Kings County, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: COLLEEN MARIE COURTNEY
Represented By: Colleen Marie Courtney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?