Roberto Durand v. David Drummond, et al
ROBERTO DURAND |
DAVID DRUMMOND, DAVID ROGERS and CLARK COUNTY COURT |
21-16967 |
November 24, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (DFO, SRT and RCT) [12326796] (RL) [Entered: 12/29/2021 08:47 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal, served and filed on November 18, 2021, was not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on May 12, 2020. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12308895] (JBS) [Entered: 12/07/2021 02:55 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Roberto Durand motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. (Letter form). [12300601] (RR) [Entered: 11/29/2021 06:50 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Roberto Durand opening brief due 01/18/2022. Appellees Clark County Court, David Drummond and David Rogers answering brief due 02/16/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12297552] (JMR) [Entered: 11/24/2021 10:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.