People of the State of Califor v. Miguel Cardona, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL A. CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Case Number: 21-16980
Filed: November 24, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2022 Filing 12 Terminated Unregistered Attorney Kathryn L. Wyer for USEDU and Miguel A. Cardona in 21-16980. Parties have alternate counsel. [12340161] (SVG) [Entered: 01/13/2022 12:40 PM]
January 12, 2022 Filing 11 Added Attorney(s) Sarah Jane Clark for party(s) Appellee USEDU and Appellee Miguel A. Cardona, in case 21-16980. [12338987] (QDL) [Entered: 01/12/2022 01:57 PM]
January 12, 2022 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Sarah Jane Clark (U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington DC, 20530) for Appellees Miguel A. Cardona and USEDU. Date of service: 01/12/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12338936] [21-16980] (Clark, Sarah) [Entered: 01/12/2022 01:35 PM]
December 17, 2021 Filing 9 Added Attorney(s) Daniel Allen Osborn for party(s) Appellant People of the State of California. [12319480] (RL) [Entered: 12/17/2021 02:21 PM]
December 17, 2021 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Daniel Allen Osborn (California Attorney General's Office, 1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612) for Appellant People of the State of California. Date of service: 12/17/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12319396] [21-16980] (Osborn, Daniel) [Entered: 12/17/2021 01:44 PM]
December 10, 2021 Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Amos Hartston for party(s) Appellant People of the State of California, in case 21-16980. [12312975] (QDL) [Entered: 12/10/2021 03:00 PM]
December 10, 2021 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Amos E. Hartston (California Department of Justice) for Appellant People of the State of California. Date of service: 12/10/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12312872] [21-16980] (Hartston, Amos) [Entered: 12/10/2021 02:29 PM]
December 1, 2021 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/01/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12303278]. [21-16980] (AD) [Entered: 12/01/2021 06:44 PM]
December 1, 2021 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant People of the State of California Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/01/2021. [12302978] [21-16980] (Eskandari, Bernard) [Entered: 12/01/2021 03:15 PM]
November 29, 2021 Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Christopher Myron Lapinig for party(s) Appellant People of the State of California. [12299894] (RL) [Entered: 11/29/2021 02:05 PM]
November 29, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christopher Myron Lapinig (California Department of Justice, Consumer Protection Section, 300 S. Spring St., Ste. 1702, Los Angeles, CA 90013) for Appellant People of the State of California. Date of service: 11/29/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12299759] [21-16980] (Lapinig, Christopher) [Entered: 11/29/2021 01:16 PM]
November 24, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant People of the State of California Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/01/2021. Transcript ordered by 12/23/2021. Transcript due 01/24/2022. Appellant People of the State of California opening brief due 03/03/2022. Appellees Miguel A. Cardona and U.S. Department of Education answering brief due 04/04/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12298213] (RT) [Entered: 11/24/2021 04:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: People of the State of Califor v. Miguel Cardona, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Represented By: Nicklas Arnold Akers
Represented By: Bernard Ardavan Eskandari
Represented By: Amos Hartston
Represented By: Christopher Myron Lapinig
Represented By: Daniel Allen Osborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MIGUEL A. CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education
Represented By: Kathryn L. Wyer
Represented By: Sarah Jane Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Represented By: Kathryn L. Wyer
Represented By: Sarah Jane Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?