Keshone Owens v. James Dzurenda, et al
| TONY CORDA, ADAM ENDEL, E. K. MCDANIEL, CONNIE BISBEE, ED GRAY, SUSAN JACKSON, MICHAEL KEELER and CHRISTOPHER DERICCA |
| KESHONE OWENS |
| JAMES DZURENDA, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, JEREMY BEAN, Warden and JENNIFER NASH |
| 21-17039 |
| December 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| KESHONE OWENS V. JAMES DZURENDA, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request filed on 01/31/2022. [12358470] (JR) [Entered: 02/02/2022 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellee Keshone Owens letter dated re: Form 29. Request for Docket Sheet, Document, or Rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12358447] (JFF) [Entered: 02/02/2022 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellee Keshone Owens response to order to show cause. [12351577] (JFF) [Entered: 01/26/2022 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jeremy Bean, James Dzurenda, Jennifer Nash and Brian Williams response to order to show cause dated 12/20/2021. Date of service: 01/10/2022. [12336577] [21-17039] (Davis, Chris) [Entered: 01/10/2022 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/28/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12326671]. [21-17039] (AD) [Entered: 12/28/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jeremy Bean, James Dzurenda, Jennifer Nash and Brian Williams Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/28/2021. [12326244] [21-17039] (Davis, Chris) [Entered: 12/28/2021 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellee Keshone Owens letter dated 12/16/2021 re: request status of appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12324095] (DJV) [Entered: 12/23/2021 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after entry of the district courts September 20, 2021 order challenged in the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1.Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12320437] (WL) [Entered: 12/20/2021 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Jeremy Bean, James Dzurenda, Jennifer Nash and Brian Williams, Warden Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/17/2021. Transcript ordered by 01/10/2022. Transcript due 02/07/2022. Appellants Jeremy Bean, James Dzurenda, Jennifer Nash and Brian Williams, Warden opening brief due 03/21/2022. Appellee Keshone Owens answering brief due 04/18/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12312569] (WL) [Entered: 12/10/2021 11:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
