Sheila Gianelli v. Ronald Schoenfeld, et al
| SHEILA LYNN GIANELLI |
| RONALD STEVEN SCHOENFELD, DEBRA LEE SILVER, LANCE SCHULTZ, NICK DUJMOVICH and PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY |
| 21-17043 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, MORGAN B. CHRISTEN and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)); see also WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12346206] (WL) [Entered: 01/20/2022 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 01/07/2022. Transcript due 02/07/2022. Appellant Sheila Lynn Gianelli opening brief due 03/18/2022. Appellees Nick Dujmovich, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Ronald Steven Schoenfeld, Lance Schultz and Debra Lee Silver answering brief due 04/18/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12313676] (JBS) [Entered: 12/13/2021 10:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
