Errick Collins v. San Francisco, California
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERRICK TYRONE COLLINS
Defendant / Appellee: SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
Case Number: 21-17048
Filed: December 13, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2022 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Errick Tyrone Collins statement that the appeal should go forward [12331818] (JFF) [Entered: 01/05/2022 11:01 AM]
January 4, 2022 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Errick Tyrone Collins letter dated re: case information. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12331230] (JFF) [Entered: 01/04/2022 04:22 PM]
December 28, 2021 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Errick Tyrone Collins motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12327179] (NAC) [Entered: 12/29/2021 01:47 PM]
December 28, 2021 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Errick Tyrone Collins statement that the appeal should go forward. [12327174] (NAC) [Entered: 12/29/2021 01:46 PM]
December 15, 2021 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12317144] (CKP) [Entered: 12/15/2021 04:00 PM]
December 15, 2021 Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 12/14/2021. [12316985] (JFF) [Entered: 12/15/2021 02:59 PM]
December 14, 2021 Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12315707] (CKP) [Entered: 12/14/2021 02:32 PM]
December 13, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Errick Tyrone Collins opening brief due 02/14/2022. [12314430] (RT) [Entered: 12/13/2021 03:02 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Errick Collins v. San Francisco, California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ERRICK TYRONE COLLINS
Represented By: Errick Tyrone Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?