Josh Hawkins v. M. Winkfield, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSH MAURICE HAWKINS, AKA Jeff Antonio Hawkins
Defendant / Appellee: M. WINKFIELD, S. PENDLETON, S. WHIPPLE and DECKER, Correctional Officer
Case Number: 21-17090
Filed: December 21, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2022 Filing 16 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: DA) : The January 5, 2022 order directed appellant to move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or to file a statement explaining why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In response, appellant filed a notice of withdrawal of the notice of appeal. Appellants withdrawal of notice of appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 14 ] ) is construed as a motion for voluntary dismissal of the appeal and is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [12353891] (RT) [Entered: 01/27/2022 04:47 PM]
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Received copy of District Court order filed on 01/19/2022 signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/19/2022 [12344599] (NAC) [Entered: 01/19/2022 12:17 PM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 14 Filed Appellant Josh Maurice Hawkins motion for withdrawal of notice of appeal. Deficiencies: None. [12343492] (NAC) [Entered: 01/18/2022 02:57 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 13 Received 1 paper copy of Opening Brief filed by Josh Maurice Hawkins. [12342442] (CPA) [Entered: 01/18/2022 09:02 AM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 12 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request received on 01/13/2022. [12340519] (JR) [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:38 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 11 Streamlined request by Appellant Josh Maurice Hawkins to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12340516] (JN) [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:34 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 10 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Josh Maurice Hawkins opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 01/13/2022 by Court via CM/ECF. (Briefing remains suspended) [12340500] (LA) [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:24 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 9 Received Appellant Josh Maurice Hawkins request for copy of FRAP Rules. [12340496] (NAC) [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:22 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Josh Maurice Hawkins response to Court order [12340495] (NAC) [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:21 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Josh Maurice Hawkins motion for monetary and firing of officers. Deficiencies: None [12340490] (NAC) [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:19 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Josh Maurice Hawkins motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None [12340487] (NAC) [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:18 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 5 Received notice of change of address dated 12/30/2021 from Josh Maurice Hawkins. New address: SANTA RITA COUNTY JAIL, 5325 Broder Boulevard, Dublin, CA 94568. (address already one file) [12340486] (NAC) [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:17 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Josh Maurice Hawkins motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12340484] (NAC) [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:15 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Josh Maurice Hawkins motion to extend time to file motion for Ceritficate of Appealability. Deficiencies: None. [12340481] (NAC) [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:13 PM]
January 5, 2022 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): The district courts judgment was entered on the docket on November 3, 2021. Appellants notice of appeal was delivered to prison officials on December 10, 2021, and received by the district court on December 17, 2021. Accordingly, the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(c); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988) (notice of appeal deemed filed when it was delivered to prison authorities for forwarding to the court). The record does not reflect that appellant has filed a motion in the district court to extend or reopen the time for appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (6), and 26(b)(1). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal, or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12332444] (CKP) [Entered: 01/05/2022 03:46 PM]
December 21, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Josh Maurice Hawkins opening brief due 02/15/2022. [12322014] (OC) [Entered: 12/21/2021 01:58 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Josh Hawkins v. M. Winkfield, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JOSH MAURICE HAWKINS, AKA Jeff Antonio Hawkins
Represented By: Josh Maurice Hawkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: M. WINKFIELD
Represented By: David Charles Goodwin Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: S. PENDLETON
Represented By: David Charles Goodwin Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: S. WHIPPLE
Represented By: David Charles Goodwin Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DECKER, Correctional Officer
Represented By: David Charles Goodwin Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?