Kevin Hawkins v. Benjamin Wagner, et al
| KEVIN T. HAWKINS, AKA Ket T. Hawkins |
| BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, US Attorney, SCOTT W. MCGREGOR, US Attorney, TODD A. PICKLES, Assistant US Attorney, MATTHEW THUESEN, Assistant US Attorney, LAURA WHITE, Former Executive Assistant US Attorney, KYLE F. REARDON, DEREK STIGERTS, Sacramento Police Department Detective, MINERVA SHELTON, FBI Special Agent, RENEE M. BASURTO, Pre-Trial Service Officer, NISHA MODICA, US Probation Officer, SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL and SCOTT JONES, Sherriff |
| 21-17099 |
| December 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Streamlined request [3] by Appellant Mr. Kevin T. Hawkins to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamlined requests allow for a 30 day extension of time to file the brief. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Kevin T. Hawkins opening brief due 03/21/2022. [12365944] (JN) [Entered: 02/10/2022 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Mr. Kevin T. Hawkins. New requested due date is 03/18/2022. [12365875] [21-17099] (Hawkins, Kevin) [Entered: 02/09/2022 09:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12329385] (CKP) [Entered: 01/03/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. NO APPEARANCE BY APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kevin T. Hawkins opening brief due 02/18/2022. [12322194] (HH) [Entered: 12/21/2021 03:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
