John Freitas v. Patrick McKinney, II, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN B. FREITAS
Defendant / Appellee: JUDGE PATRICK RICHARD MCKINNEY II, Superior Court of the State of California, Alameda County, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: 21-17104
Filed: December 21, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2022 Filing 11 Received copy of motion filed in district court re: appellant's desingation of record and issues on appeal. Motion filed by Appellant John B. Freitas. [12361397] (DJV) [Entered: 02/04/2022 03:03 PM]
January 27, 2022 Filing 10 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-17104: IFP Pending In COA] ). [12352812] (DJV) [Entered: 01/27/2022 06:44 AM]
January 24, 2022 Filing 9 Filed Appellant John B. Freitas response to court's order of 1/05/22 and motion for IFP . Served on 01/26/2022. [12352809] (DJV) [Entered: 01/27/2022 06:43 AM]
January 5, 2022 Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12332094] (CKP) [Entered: 01/05/2022 01:05 PM]
January 4, 2022 Filing 7 Received copy of District Court order filed on 01/04/2022 case is dismissed and if aplt wishs to proceed In Forma Pauperis aplt may make that request to the appeals court . [12330378] (DJV) [Entered: 01/04/2022 10:12 AM]
December 29, 2021 Filing 6 Received copy of motion filed in district court re: for IFP. Motion filed by Appellant John B. Freitas. [12327226] (DJV) [Entered: 12/29/2021 02:05 PM]
December 29, 2021 Filing 5 Filed Appellant John B. Freitas letter dated 12/28/2021 re: designation of record ; addressed to USDC. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12327219] (DJV) [Entered: 12/29/2021 02:03 PM]
December 29, 2021 Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-17104: Due] ). [12326995] (DJV) [Entered: 12/29/2021 11:21 AM]
December 29, 2021 Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 12/28/2021 denying motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. [12326993] (DJV) [Entered: 12/29/2021 11:20 AM]
December 22, 2021 Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12323009] (CKP) [Entered: 12/22/2021 12:49 PM]
December 21, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant John B. Freitas opening brief due 02/22/2022. [12322401] (JMR) [Entered: 12/21/2021 04:51 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Freitas v. Patrick McKinney, II, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JOHN B. FREITAS
Represented By: John B. Freitas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JUDGE PATRICK RICHARD MCKINNEY II, Superior Court of the State of California, Alameda County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?