Thomas Clay v. Department of Treasury, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS CLAY
Defendant / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN
Case Number: 21-17115
Filed: December 23, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2022 Filing 10 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Thomas Clay opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 02/16/2022. (Briefing is stayed) [12375123] (KT) [Entered: 02/18/2022 03:23 PM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 9 Received notice of change of address dated 02/03/2022 from Thomas Clay. New address: # 1124123, Michael Unit, 12 Block, A-Pod, 63, 2664 FM, 2054, Tennesse Colony, Texas, 75886.. [12370305] --[Edited: Updated Address. 02/15/2022 by TYL] (DJV) [Entered: 02/15/2022 07:36 AM]
February 7, 2022 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Thomas Clay response to court's 01/06/22 order . Served on 01/21/2022. [12363411] (DJV) [Entered: 02/08/2022 06:39 AM]
February 7, 2022 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Thomas Clay motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/21/2022. [12363410] (DJV) [Entered: 02/08/2022 06:37 AM]
January 11, 2022 Filing 6 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12337333] (DJV) [Entered: 01/11/2022 11:26 AM]
January 6, 2022 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12333290] (CKP) [Entered: 01/06/2022 01:25 PM]
January 6, 2022 Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-17115: Due] ). [12332858] (DJV) [Entered: 01/06/2022 09:22 AM]
January 6, 2022 Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 01/05/2022 in forma pauperis revoked . [12332855] (DJV) [Entered: 01/06/2022 09:21 AM]
January 5, 2022 Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12332098] (CKP) [Entered: 01/05/2022 01:08 PM]
December 23, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Thomas Clay opening brief due 02/22/2022. [12324289] (WL) [Entered: 12/23/2021 02:59 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas Clay v. Department of Treasury, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: THOMAS CLAY
Represented By: Thomas Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?