George Austin v. Lisa Atlina, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Esq.
Defendant / Appellee: LISA NHU ATLINA, GALLAGHER BASSETT, EVERESTRE, GUIDO GAITERI, SEAN PHILLIP DUCAR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and MARIBETH ARENDT, Bar #191843
Case Number: 21-17126
Filed: December 28, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2022 Filing 8 Filed order (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, MORGAN B. CHRISTEN and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12347814] (WL) [Entered: 01/21/2022 03:24 PM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant George Jarvis Austin EMERGENCY Motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 12/28/2021. Date of service: 01/18/2022. [12342489] [21-17126] (Austin, George) [Entered: 01/18/2022 09:17 AM]
January 4, 2022 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant George Jarvis Austin Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 01/04/2022. [12331408] [21-17126] (Austin, George) [Entered: 01/04/2022 08:43 PM]
December 30, 2021 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant George Jarvis Austin response to Court order dated 12/30/2021. Date of service: 12/30/2021. [12328305] [21-17126] (Austin, George) [Entered: 12/30/2021 11:44 PM]
December 30, 2021 Filing 4 Received copy of District Court order filed on 12/29/2021. Denying IFP motion [12328107] (RR) [Entered: 12/30/2021 03:03 PM]
December 29, 2021 Filing 3 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12326802] (RR) [Entered: 12/29/2021 08:53 AM]
December 29, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant George Jarvis Austin Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 08/12/2022. Date of service: 12/29/2021. [12326686] [21-17126] (Austin, George) [Entered: 12/29/2021 12:04 AM]
December 28, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant George Jarvis Austin opening brief due 02/28/2022. Appellees Maribeth Arendt, Lisa Nhu Atlina, Gallagher Bassett, Sean Phillip Ducar, Everestre, Guido Gaiteri and U.S. Department of Health & Human Services answering brief due 03/28/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12326282] (RT) [Entered: 12/28/2021 02:36 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: George Austin v. Lisa Atlina, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Esq.
Represented By: George Jarvis Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LISA NHU ATLINA
Represented By: Eric Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GALLAGHER BASSETT
Represented By: Kenneth Watnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: EVERESTRE
Represented By: Lori A. Reihl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GUIDO GAITERI
Represented By: Maria Teresa Solomon-Williams
Represented By: Maria Solomon-Williams Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SEAN PHILLIP DUCAR
Represented By: Robert Ferrier
Represented By: Robert M. Ferrier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Represented By: Valerie Elizabeth Smith Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARIBETH ARENDT, Bar #191843
Represented By: Susan Mary Marsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?