Molina-Zavala v. Garland
| ANDRES MOLINA-ZAVALA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-274 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Paper copies (12) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 11/30/2021 10:50:00 AM] Updated number of copies. [Edited: 11/30/2021 11:27:00 AM] |
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 11/22/2021 02:35:00 PM]
|
| Filing 19 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/22/2021 10:23:00 AM] |
| Filing 18 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Petitioner Andres Molina-Zavala received. [Entered: 10/28/2021 02:14:00 PM] |
| Filing 17 CLERK ORDER. Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Petitioner Andres Molina-Zavala is filed. Within 7 days of this order, petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/27/2021 02:18:00 PM] |
| Filing 16 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Andres Molina-Zavala. [Entered: 09/24/2021 06:08:00 PM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Zulu Ali for Andres Molina-Zavala. [Entered: 09/24/2021 05:44:00 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 11) not opposed. [Entered: 09/22/2021 10:28:00 AM]
|
| Filing 13 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/21/2021 10:29:00 AM] |
| Filing 12 Motion to Stay Removal filed at DE 11; Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due 10/8/2021. [Entered: 09/17/2021 04:56:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 07/08/2021 12:15:00 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Form 4 (DE 3) granted, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Form 4 (DE 4) granted. [Entered: 06/25/2021 03:31:00 PM]
|
| Filing 8 ADDED Andrew Jacob Oliveira for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/22/2021 12:24:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew Jacob Oliveira for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/22/2021 12:02:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 7/26/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 9/24/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 11/23/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/21/2021 09:19:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 6/18/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-274 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/21/2021 09:15:00 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/17/2021 04:50:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 06/18/2021 07:04:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 06/18/2021 07:04:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 5/21/2021. [Entered: 06/18/2021 07:03:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 06/18/2021 07:03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Molina-Zavala v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ANDRES MOLINA-ZAVALA | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Zulu Ali |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Represented By: | Andrew Jacob Oliveira |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
