Rivera Romero v. Garland
| MANUEL DE JESUS RIVERA ROMERO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-288 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion to remand this matter to the Board of Immigration Appeals (Docket Entry No. 29) is granted. Petitioners removal is stayed pending a Board decision in this matter. As stated in the unopposed motion, the parties shall bear their own fees and costs. This order served on the agency shall act as the mandate of this court. REMANDED. [Entered: 12/22/2022 04:07 PM]
|
| Filing 29 MOTION to remand case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/22/2022 08:28 AM] |
| Filing 28 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco, CA. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for April 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 12/19/2022 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 27 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/15/2022 02:29 PM] |
|
Filing 26
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 25) denied. Extension is not allowed per court order (DE 18). The filer must file a motion per 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(b). [Entered: 12/15/2022 11:09 AM]
|
| Filing 25 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/15/2022 08:27 AM] |
| Filing 24 Paper copies (6) of Replacement Opening Brief submitted at DE 22 by Petitioner Manuel De Jesus Rivera Romero received. [Entered: 10/24/2022 04:49 PM] |
|
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Replacement Opening Brief submitted at DE 22 by Petitioner Manuel De Jesus Rivera Romero is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/17/2022 02:24 PM]
|
| Filing 22 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Manuel De Jesus Rivera Romero. [Entered: 10/14/2022 11:02 AM] [Edited: 10/17/2022 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 21 CERTIFICATION for law student representation form filed by Petitioner Manuel De Jesus Rivera Romero. [Entered: 09/23/2022 09:43:00 AM] |
| Filing 20 CLIENT AUTHORIZATION of law school representation filed by Petitioner Manuel De Jesus Rivera Romero. [Entered: 09/23/2022 09:42:00 AM] |
| Filing 19 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Tiffany Joana Gates, Stephen Tollafield, Gary A Watt for Petitioner Manuel De Jesus Rivera Romero. [Entered: 08/01/2022 03:50:17 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Pursuant to this courts June 21, 2022 order, Tiffany J. Gates, Esq., Stephen Tollafield, Esq., Gary Watt, Esq., and the University of Hastings College of Law, are hereby appointed to represent petitioner for purposes of this petition for review only. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect that Tiffany J. Gates, Esq., Law Offices of Tiffany J. Gates, 3940 Broad Street, Suite 7, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, Email: tiffanyjgates@gmail.com; Stephen Tollafield, Esq., U.C. Hastings College of the Law, 200 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102, Email: Tollafie@uchastings.edu; and Gary A. Watt, Esq., Hanson Bridgett LLP, 425 Market Street, 26th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105, Email: GWatt@hansonbridgett.com, are pro bono counsel of record for petitioner. Briefing will proceed as follows: the supplemental or replacement opening brief is due October 14, 2022; the answering brief is due December 16, 2022; and the optional reply brief is due February 17, 2023. This petition will be calendared for oral argument during the month of April 2023. Petitioner is encouraged to file replacement briefing rather than supplemental briefing. Pro bono counsel shall state on the cover of the opening brief whether it is a replacement brief or a supplemental brief. If a replacement brief is filed, the Clerk shall strike the previously tendered brief. SEE ORDER FOR FULL INFORMATION. [Entered: 08/01/2022 03:28:37 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. The governments motion for summary disposition (Docket Entry No. 16) is denied because the questions raised by this petition are sufficient to warrant full briefing. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(a) (standard for summary disposition); see also United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). The appointment of pro bono counsel in this petition would benefit the courts review. The Clerk will enter an order appointing pro bono counsel to represent petitioner before this court. After locating suitable counsel, the Clerk will set a revised briefing schedule. If petitioner objects to the courts appointment of counsel in this petition, petitioner must file a written objection within 14 days after the date of this order. [Entered: 06/21/2022 04:31:00 PM]
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for summary disposition filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/23/2021 09:44:00 AM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 14) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Respondent Answering Brief due 12/27/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 11/22/2021 04:49:00 PM]
|
| Filing 14 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/22/2021 01:09:00 PM] |
| Filing 13 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 12 by Petitioner Manuel De Jesus Rivera Romero is filed. Original and 7 copies. [Entered: 09/27/2021 01:41:00 PM] |
| Filing 12 STRICKEN PER ORDER AT DE 18 --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Manuel De Jesus Rivera Romero. [Entered: 09/27/2021 01:39:00 PM] [Edited: 11/02/2022 02:27 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) not opposed. [Entered: 08/18/2021 10:39:00 AM]
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 07/09/2021 11:37:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 ADDED Jennifer A. Bowen for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/23/2021 08:42:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/23/2021 08:40:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jennifer A. Bowen for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/23/2021 07:16:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Cardozo Payne for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/23/2021 06:23:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 FEE PAID by Petitioner(s). (Receipt #4709005096)[Entered: 06/22/2021 04:00:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 7/27/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 8/17/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 9/27/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 11/24/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/22/2021 03:54:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 6/22/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-288 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/22/2021 03:53:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 06/22/2021 02:22:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 06/22/2021 02:22:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
