USA, et al v. Louis Holger Eklund

USA, et al v. Louis Holger Eklund

Defendant / Appellant:	LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND, AKA Louis Holger
Plaintiff / Appellee:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number:	21-30116
Filed:	May 3, 2021
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
May 3, 2021	Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KH): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the April 26, 2021, jury verdict is not appealable as a final judgment or an order that comes within the collateral order doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 798 (1989) (in criminal cases, finality requirement generally prohibits appellate review until after conviction and imposition of sentence). Within 21 days of this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court.[12100667] (AF) [Entered: 05/03/2021 05:25 PM]
May 3, 2021	Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: N/A. Transcript ordered by 05/20/2021. Transcript due 06/21/2021. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 07/29/2021 for Louis Holger Eklund. Appellee brief due 08/30/2021 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. (Appeal filed Pro Se, Counsel still Appointed) [12099473] (JMR) [Entered: 05/03/2021 10:25 AM]

Date Filed

Document Text

May 3, 2021

Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KH): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the April 26, 2021, jury verdict is not appealable as a final judgment or an order that comes within the collateral order doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 798 (1989) (in criminal cases, finality requirement generally prohibits appellate review until after conviction and imposition of sentence). Within 21 days of this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court.[12100667] (AF) [Entered: 05/03/2021 05:25 PM]

May 3, 2021

Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: N/A. Transcript ordered by 05/20/2021. Transcript due 06/21/2021. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 07/29/2021 for Louis Holger Eklund. Appellee brief due 08/30/2021 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. (Appeal filed Pro Se, Counsel still Appointed) [12099473] (JMR) [Entered: 05/03/2021 10:25 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA, et al v. Louis Holger Eklund
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND, AKA Louis Holger
Represented By:	Louis Holger Eklund
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	Stephen Corso
Represented By:	Jonas Walker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?