Montejo Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
| CLAUDIA ELENA MONTEJO GONZALEZ, DANY JUAN FRANCISCO MONTEJO and MARIA NATALIA FRANCISCO MONTEJO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-304 |
| June 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 42 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to Daniel P. COLLINS, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr., Roopali H. DESAI. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the courts website at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [Entered: 10/05/2023 03:54 PM] |
Filing 41
ORDER FILED. Petitioners Unopposed Motion to Submit the Case on the Briefs, Dkt. 37, is DENIED. However, the parties are permitted to appear remotely by video for oral argument by providing notice to the clerks office. The case will remain set for oral argument on October 5, 2023, at 9:00 A.M. [Entered: 09/22/2023 04:48 PM]
|
| Filing 40 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Anthony Nardi for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/12/2023 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 39 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Anthony Nardi for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/11/2023 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 38 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Nardi for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/11/2023 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 37 MOTION to submit case on briefs without oral argument filed by Petitioner Claudia Elena Montejo Gonzalez, Petitioner Dany Juan Francisco Montejo, Petitioner Maria Natalia Francisco Montejo. [Entered: 07/28/2023 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 36 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Tina Nicole Malek for Petitioner Claudia Elena Montejo Gonzalez, Petitioner Dany Juan Francisco Montejo, Petitioner Maria Natalia Francisco Montejo. [Entered: 07/24/2023 09:04 PM] |
| Filing 35 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Thursday, October 5, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [21-304] [Entered: 07/24/2023 06:00 PM] |
| Filing 34 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, October 5, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [21-304] [Entered: 07/24/2023 05:29 PM] |
| Filing 33 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, October 5, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [21-304] [Entered: 07/24/2023 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 32 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for October 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [21-304] [Entered: 06/22/2023 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 31 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 29 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 09/23/2022 04:13:00 PM] |
|
Filing 30
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 29 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/19/2022 01:09:00 PM]
|
| Filing 29 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/19/2022 12:41:00 PM] |
|
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 27) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due September 21, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/12/2022 10:34:00 AM]
|
| Filing 27 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/11/2022 10:02:00 AM] |
|
Filing 26
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 25) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due August 22, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/12/2022 04:13:00 PM]
|
| Filing 25 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/12/2022 06:39:00 AM] |
|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 23) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due July 22, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/13/2022 03:26:00 PM]
|
| Filing 23 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/13/2022 09:08:00 AM] |
|
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 21) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due May 23, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/15/2022 03:11:00 PM]
|
| Filing 21 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/15/2022 06:48:00 AM] |
| Filing 20 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioners received. [Entered: 01/31/2022 04:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 19 TERMINATED participation of Rachel Louise Browning representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/31/2022 12:11:00 PM] |
| Filing 18 ADDED Rosanne Perry for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/31/2022 12:09:00 PM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rosanne Perry for Merrick B. Garland replacing Rachel Louise Browning. [Entered: 01/31/2022 06:51:00 AM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioners is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 01/24/2022 05:30:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Motion to Accept Late Filing (DE 14) granted. [Entered: 01/24/2022 03:02:00 PM]
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to accept late filing filed by Petitioner Maria Natalia Francisco Montejo, Petitioner Dany Juan Francisco Montejo, Petitioner Claudia Elena Montejo Gonzalez. [Entered: 01/06/2022 11:58:00 AM] |
| Filing 13 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Maria Natalia Francisco Montejo, Petitioner Dany Juan Francisco Montejo, Petitioner Claudia Elena Montejo Gonzalez. [Entered: 01/06/2022 09:00:00 AM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Motion to Reinstate (DE 11) granted. Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/17/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 2/15/2022 [Entered: 12/02/2021 01:23:00 PM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to reinstate case filed by Petitioner Maria Natalia Francisco Montejo, Petitioner Dany Juan Francisco Montejo, Petitioner Claudia Elena Montejo Gonzalez. [Entered: 11/10/2021 08:49:00 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Dismissal for failure to file opening brief. [Entered: 11/10/2021 10:28:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) not opposed. [Entered: 08/24/2021 09:50:00 AM]
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 07/15/2021 11:22:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Rachel Louise Browning for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/06/2021 09:29:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rachel Louise Browning for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/06/2021 08:04:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 5/25/2021. [Entered: 06/25/2021 10:56:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 7/30/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 8/20/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 9/28/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 11/29/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/25/2021 08:35:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 6/24/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-304 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/25/2021 08:30:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 06/24/2021 07:46:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 06/24/2021 07:45:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
