Gamily v. Garland
Petitioner: AHMED MOHAMMED SHERIF GAMILY
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 21-312
Filed: June 25, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Motion to Administratively Close Case (DE 17) granted. [Entered: 12/10/2021 04:24:00 PM]
December 9, 2021 Filing 17 MOTION to administratively close case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/09/2021 10:37:00 AM]
November 10, 2021 Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Ahmed Mohammed Sherif Gamily received. [Entered: 11/10/2021 01:26:00 PM]
October 29, 2021 Filing 15 CLERK ORDER. Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Ahmed Mohammed Sherif Gamily is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/29/2021 10:16:00 AM]
October 28, 2021 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Ahmed Mohammed Sherif Gamily. [Entered: 10/28/2021 03:44:00 PM]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDFs of brief (corrected cover) and addendum (added index)] [Edited: 10/29/2021 10:11:00 AM]
September 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 10/28/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 12/27/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 09/24/2021 01:06:00 PM]
September 23, 2021 Filing 12 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Ahmed Mohammed Sherif Gamily. [Entered: 09/23/2021 05:36:00 PM]
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED Supplemental Motion to Stay Removal (DE 8) not opposed, Motion to Stay Removal (DE 3) not opposed. [Entered: 08/16/2021 03:28:00 PM]
August 16, 2021 Filing 10 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent. [Entered: 08/16/2021 01:36:00 PM]
July 15, 2021 Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 07/15/2021 11:01:00 AM]
July 9, 2021 Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 07/09/2021 05:16:00 PM]
July 1, 2021 Filing 7 ADDED Lynda Do for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/01/2021 08:32:00 AM]
July 1, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lynda Do for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/01/2021 04:55:00 AM]
June 25, 2021 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 7/30/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 8/20/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 9/28/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 11/29/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/25/2021 04:28:00 PM]
June 25, 2021 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 6/25/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-312 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/25/2021 04:25:00 PM]
June 25, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 06/25/2021 03:31:00 PM]
June 25, 2021 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 6/10/2021. [Entered: 06/25/2021 03:30:00 PM]
June 25, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 06/25/2021 03:30:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gamily v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: AHMED MOHAMMED SHERIF GAMILY
Represented By: Mr. David Andrew Schlesinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Lynda Do
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?