Aparicio-Reyes v. Garland
Petitioner: JOSE LUIS APARICIO-REYES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 21-341
Filed: July 1, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 22, 2023 APARICIO-REYES V. GARLAND

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MANDATE ISSUED William C. CANBY, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, John B. OWENS [Entered: 11/14/2023 09:37 AM]
September 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (William C. CANBY, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, John B. OWENS) PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 09/22/2023 10:50 AM]
April 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER FILED. Petitioners filing at Docket Entry No. 26 is treated as an opposed motion for administrative closure and is denied. The optional reply brief remains due April 25, 2022. [Entered: 04/15/2022 03:28:00 PM]
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 RESPONSE to Motion to Administratively Close Case (DE 26) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/01/2022 06:30:00 PM]
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 24) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 4/25/2022. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/22/2022 09:50:00 AM]
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MOTION to administratively close case filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Aparicio-Reyes. [Entered: 04/01/2022 02:39:00 PM]
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file reply brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Aparicio-Reyes. [Entered: 03/22/2022 09:39:00 AM]
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 DEFECTIVE --- CORRESPONDENCE filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Aparicio-Reyes. [Entered: 03/21/2022 02:17:00 PM]--[Correct entry at DE 26.] [Edited: 04/01/2022 02:46:00 PM]
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 03/10/2022 05:20:00 PM]
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 03/04/2022 04:33:00 PM]
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/04/2022 12:38:00 PM]
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Petitioner Jose Luis Aparicio-Reyes is filed. Original and 5 copies. [Entered: 01/18/2022 11:35:00 AM]
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Motion to accept late filing [17], is granted. Amended briefing schedule: Respondent Answering Brief due 3/7/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/06/2022 05:03:00 PM]
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MOTION to accept late filing filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Aparicio-Reyes. [Entered: 12/29/2021 04:13:00 PM]
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Jose Luis Aparicio-Reyes. Original and 5 copies. [Entered: 12/28/2021 04:03:00 PM]
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 14) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/16/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 2/14/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 11/15/2021 05:00:00 PM]
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Aparicio-Reyes. [Entered: 11/15/2021 04:59:00 PM]
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED Michael Daly HAWKINS, Kenneth K. LEE Motion for Appointment of Counsel (DE 4) denied. [Entered: 09/16/2021 03:31:00 PM]
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) not opposed. [Entered: 08/25/2021 01:22:00 PM]
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/23/2021 01:27:00 PM]
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 07/21/2021 09:26:00 AM]
July 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Form 4 (DE 3) granted. [Entered: 07/09/2021 05:55:00 PM]
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ADDED Remi da Rocha-Afodu for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/06/2021 12:17:00 PM]
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Remi da Rocha-Afodu for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/06/2021 12:15:00 PM]
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 8/5/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 8/26/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 10/4/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 12/3/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/01/2021 01:52:00 PM]
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 7/1/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-341 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/01/2021 01:49:00 PM]
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 07/01/2021 01:12:00 PM]
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 07/01/2021 01:11:00 PM]
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 07/01/2021 01:11:00 PM]
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 07/01/2021 01:11:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Aparicio-Reyes v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSE LUIS APARICIO-REYES
Represented By: Jose Luis Aparicio-Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Remi da Rocha-Afodu
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?