Brandon Gates v. Jose Briones, et al
| WILLIAM E. BECKER, Lieutenant, Island County Corrections and JOSE BRIONES, Chief Jail Administrator, Island County Corrections |
| BRANDON T. GATES |
| 21-35044 |
| January 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Brandon T. Gates motion request for documents and rules, waiver of fees and 30 day extension of time. Deficiencies: None. [12046653] (JFF) [Entered: 03/18/2021 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12007052] (CKP) [Entered: 02/17/2021 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Brandon T. Gates letter dated re: classification appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12004712] (JFF) [Entered: 02/16/2021 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 01/28/2021. [Case Number 21-35044: Partially Paid] [12004708] (JFF) [Entered: 02/16/2021 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11974184] (CKP) [Entered: 01/21/2021 12:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Brandon T. Gates opening brief due 03/22/2021. Appellees William E. Becker and Jose Briones answering brief due 04/19/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11968153] (JPD) [Entered: 01/19/2021 02:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
