USA v. Ebenezer Howe, IV, et al
| PHI DEVELOPMENT LLC |
| EBENEZER K. HOWE IV |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 21-35125 |
| February 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 2 ] filed by Mr. Ebenezer K. Howe, IV. [12051171] (CPA) [Entered: 03/23/2021 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR., BRIDGET S. BADE and PATRICK J. BUMATAY) Appellees motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is granted (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]). See 28 U.S.C. 1291; McCright v. Santoki, 976 F.2d 568, 569-70 (9th Cir. 1992) (order denying plaintiffs motion for Rule 11 sanctions against opposing counsel can be effectively reviewed on appeal from final judgment in underlying action); see also Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). DISMISSED. [12033095] (WL) [Entered: 03/11/2021 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Ebenezer K. Howe, IV reply to response (). Date of service: 03/10/2021. [12031019] [21-35125] (Howe, Ebenezer) [Entered: 03/10/2021 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA reply to response (). Date of service: 03/09/2021. [12029082] [21-35125] (Sheehan, Anthony) [Entered: 03/09/2021 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Ebenezer K. Howe, IV response to motion ([ # 7 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 7 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction). Date of service: 03/08/2021. [12027731] [21-35125] (Howe, Ebenezer) [Entered: 03/08/2021 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 03/05/2021. [12026037] [21-35125] (Sheehan, Anthony) [Entered: 03/05/2021 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Bruce R. Ellisen for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 21-35125. [12025884] (QDL) [Entered: 03/05/2021 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Bruce R. Ellisen (U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Appellate Section, Post Office Box 502, Washington, D.C. 20044) for Appellee USA. Date of service: 03/05/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12025834] [21-35125] (Ellisen, Bruce) [Entered: 03/05/2021 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 2 ] submitted by Mr. Ebenezer K. Howe, IV is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12021690] (KWG) [Entered: 03/02/2021 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-35125: Paid] ). [12021494] (CKP) [Entered: 03/02/2021 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Ebenezer K. Howe, IV. Date of service: 02/24/2021. [12014846] [21-35125] (Howe, Ebenezer) [Entered: 02/24/2021 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ebenezer K. Howe IV opening brief due 04/19/2021. Appellee United States of America answering brief due 05/19/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12004344] (RT) [Entered: 02/16/2021 12:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
