Dennis Underwood v. Cox, et al
BRAD CAIN, COURT CLERK, YIM YOU, Judge, JANELL ROCHESTER, MAUREEN ROSSI, JOHN DOE, COX and ROJAS |
DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD |
21-35135 |
February 19, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (MDS, BSB and PJB) [12063232] (RL) [Entered: 04/05/2021 10:07 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR., BRIDGET S. BADE and PATRICK J. BUMATAY) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable); see also In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12039024] (WL) [Entered: 03/12/2021 08:54 AM] |
Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12018278] (JFF) [Entered: 02/26/2021 02:13 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Dennis Burton Underwood opening brief due 04/21/2021. [12009973] (RT) [Entered: 02/19/2021 02:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.